Monday, April 8, 2013

Has Anyone Seen 663,000 People? Anyone? Anyone? (Bueller?)

The jobs report for March 2013 came out with some dismal results. Dismal is an understatement if you really look at the numbers. The jobs data suggested an increase in jobs, in the form of nonfarm payroll employment ‘edged’ (BLS’s phrase, my scary quotes) up by 88,000. The unemployment rate dropped .10% to 7.6%. Sounded weak, but plodding along, right? Wrong. There’s an old saying of ‘figures lie and liars figure’. I wanted to look a little deeper, and one of my old profs (Dr. Don Byrne) had pointed out that the underlying number were much more complex. Consider the following:


Bureau of Labor Statistics 4/5/2013 Seasonally Adjusted

So look at these statistics
  • The Civilian Noninstitutional Population (people over 16, not in prison or in the military) increased by 167 thousand people.
  • The number of employed dropped by 206 thousand.
  • The number of unemployed dropped by 290 thousand.
  • The labor force dropped by 496 thousand (206 + 290).
  • And if the working eligible population increased by 167 thousand and the labor force dropped by 496 thousand, that means that 663 thousand more people are not in the work force.
Since I like charts and graphs, I decided to chart the comparison of the population/workforce and number unemployed from the end of June 2009 (the technical end of the recession) to March of 2013:


Pictures can sometimes tell us a lot (a picture is worth 1,000 data points?). Note the population of eligible workers has steadily grown since 06/09 (work-eligible population increased by about 9.3 million people, or about 4%), while the number of unemployed has gone down (by about 2.9 million, about a 17% decline). If you’re wondering about the zigzags, I didn’t ‘seasonally adjust‘ the data in the above graph, so it reflects spikes at the end of the year. So far, so good. Looks like wonderful growth and sound economic and fiscal stimulus. Now notice that the workforce went down (by 1.4 million people, or about 1%).Here’s the ugly fact: the population went up, unemployment went down, but the number of people working went down. That gives a different way to look at employment:

The number of Americans not in the workforce has increased by 10.7 million a 13.4% increase.

The labor force participation rate is the lowest it’s been since 1978. It doesn’t look to me like a lot of jobs are being created. And it makes me wonder what happens if the trend continues. Anyone know the answer? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?


Leon


PS: A portion of the blog title is from one of my favorite movies, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, in which Ferris skips school to have a great fun time. Somehow, it seems appropriate.

Monday, March 18, 2013

Look at the Security Camera…Smile and Say ‘Feta’: Cypriot Bank Robbers?


Someone on Cyprus had a brilliant idea to bail out their banking system: to impose a tax on bank accounts. If you have less than €100,000, they want to tax the account 6.75%. If you have over €100,000, the tax would be 9.9%. So, in effect, you now have the Cypriot government proposing to rob bank accounts. It is impressive: no scrawled notes, no guns, no panic. Just good old-fashioned theft.

How well will this work? Well, if I had a Cyprus bank account (I don’t), I’d take all of my money out of the bank. The Russian depositors, as well as the Cypriots, will probably do the same. I’d also imagine if I had a Greek, Italian, or Spanish bank account, I’d do the same. It seems pretty illogical to me to try to solve a banking crisis by creating one. But heck, who am I to question the wisdom of the Euro Zone Finance Ministers?

Now, to be sure, Cyprus is a small country. I’ll bet a lot of you don’t know where it is, or what the capital is (Nicosia). According to the CIA Fact Book (the name of which seems like an oxymoron), the GDP of Cyprus is $25B USD. In the Forbes list of the world’s billionaires (otherwise known as Paris Hilton’s date prospect list), there are a lot of Russian billionaires (I counted 101). The top 10 have a net worth of around $160B. So these guys could buy Cyprus, and then rob their own banks of their own money.

Kidding aside, the notion of a tax on bank deposits is a bad idea. It encourages a run on banks, and further encourages a flee to safety. Watch Cyprus, for that domino may indicate what is to come. By the way, what got Cyprus into this trouble is the normal Mediterranean custom of borrowing and spending too much money. Cyprus is not a poor country: it has a very high GDP per capita ($30,571 in 2011). But Cyprus has a load of debt: public debt is 84% of GDP, and it had a deficit of €1.132 B, or 6.3% of GDP. Those profligate Cypriots should look to the US, the paragon of financial virtue. The US has debt of 107% of GDP and a deficit of 6.8% of GDP. Wait…that doesn’t sound so good. But don’t worry, Washington will fix it…

Smile for the camera, and say 'TupĂ­!'

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Happy New Year? Now What?



As the end of the year approached, I wondered if the Mayan calendar makers and the folks in Washington had the same playbook. But at midnight, the ball descended onto Times Square and ushered in 2013 and the last second fix on the Cliff. The critical question is: Now what?

The President and Congress (the Senate actually, as I write the blog), in a paragon of diligence and virtue, passed a last minute “fix” on the Fiscal Cliff. The fix, as predicted, is a combination of spending cuts and tax increases on the upper brackets. This fix is minor to the overall economic situation (it appears to be about 10% of the deficit), but it does avert the prospective recession and turmoil caused by the full cliff. The Devil is in the details (and in the House voting on the deal), so we’ll reserve full judgment on the new Bill until we see the full provisions.

The fix cleared the Senate on an 89-8 vote early Tuesday, hours after Vice President Joe Biden and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky sealed a deal.

It would prevent middle-class taxes from going up but would raise rates on higher incomes. It would also block spending cuts for two months, extend unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless, prevent a 27 percent cut in fees for doctors who treat Medicare patients, and prevent a spike in milk prices. Taxes on upper-income individuals (over $400,000 single and $450,000 married) go up. The estate tax changes to a 40% rate (up from 35%) on estates over $5 million ($10 million for couples). The budget sequestration cuts are delayed by two months. The tax rate on capital gains and dividends for high brackets individuals goes up to 20%.

In addition to the fix, we should note that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) now imposes a tax of 3.8% on dividends, interest and capital gains starting in 2013. This tax is imposed on single filers making over $200,000 and married filing joint filers making over $250,000. So individuals with incomes over $450K will have a tax of 23.8% on dividends and capital gains. It further appears that the payroll tax holiday has expired, and the FICA employee contribution has returned to its original rate.

As for me, it has been frustrating to watch the machinations of Washington, particularly when it appears that we, as citizens, are pawns in the game and our economy and well-being seems to take a second place to ideology. I’m happy we have a fix, although I would prefer it not be done like term papers at Michigan State—at midnight on the due date. The cliff seems to be averted, but the game is not over, and more than likely just getting started. Stay tuned.

Happy New Year?

Leon


Friday, December 7, 2012

2013 Economic Outlook: Austerity Lite, Austerity Regular, or Austerity Stout


For 2013, a theme of Austerity is clearly emerging with the uncertainty of the “Fiscal Cliff." The European Union is forcing austerity on its Southern countries, and the Fiscal Cliff and looming debt leviathan is forcing austerity on the US. Our outlook looks at three versions of austerity and the probable consequences for the New Year.

Cliff Note One: Austerity Lite

"Austerity Lite” is a Band-Aid style patch where some modest revenue increases are coupled with some very modest budget cuts. Light tax increases and light budget cuts will probably avert an immediate recession, but keep the deficit growing. This may be the form of extending all or most of the status quo. We’ll define “austerity lite” as any combination of revenue increase or spending cuts that total less than $2T over ten years. Incidentally, the deficit for ONE Year is about $1.2T.

Cliff Note Two: Austerity Regular

"Austerity Regular” would be a bargain that takes both sides into some serious movement. We’d call this a Simpson-Bowles scenario (more than $2T of cuts over ten years). Here there is movement toward deficit reduction and probably averting a recession, although this aspect may entail low or negative growth in the first quarter of 2013.

Cliff Note Three: Austerity Stout. 

“Austerity Stout” is a drive off the cliff and the ensuing mess of the wreck. Our version is simply that $800+B of tax increases and budget cuts will trigger a recession, increase unemployment, decrease consumer spending and cut corporate profits. Any silver lining is that the stout version is so untenable it would most likely move the country toward serious tax reform, plus put a big dent in the deficit, at the cost of a recession.

The reason we elaborate the three scenarios is that each has a different effect on the outlook for 2013.

Economic Growth:

In one of the two lighter scenarios (Austerity Lite and Austerity Regular), we suggest that GDP will have modest growth, probably in the range of 1.5%-2.0%. Our take is that the Austerity Lite is most like the status quo, and so the prognosis of this solution to the cliff is that Lite is ‘continued anemia’. A more robust deficit reduction proposal (albeit only a modestly painful one) would probably have an initial damper on GDP in the first two quarters, and more growth in the third and forth. Austerity Stout would be disruptive and probably shrink GDP by 2-3% in the first two quarters and maybe for the year by a negative 3-4%.

US Equities (S&P 500)

 Our version is the US equity market, as measured by the S&P 500, is showing relative undervaluation based on the political uncertainty. The S&P forward PE is lower than the 10 and 15-year average PE, and the S&P earnings yield is significantly higher than the Baa bond yield. The S&P dividend yield is higher than the 10-year treasury by a significant amount, and the alternate investment in bank deposits has an effective return of almost zero. In this environment, under the Lite scenario, stocks return to being one of the only viable investment alternatives (compared to both international and fixed) and the stock market will probably revert to a normal return. In the Regular scenario, stocks have a greater opportunity to operate under certainty, so we’d suggest that the market may lead the economy and grow faster. In the Stout scenario, corporate earnings and top-line revenue would both suffer and the market would likely decline.

Sentiment

We feel that there is a tendency among analysts to ignore consumer sentiment. Since markets are behaviorally driven, we’d suggest that PE and sentiment are correlated (the R2 is actually .75) as are real (inflation adjusted) yields (the R2 is .68). Under a Lite scenario, consumer sentiment will likely stay in the 80 range, probably keeping both PE and Real return at the status quo. Under a Regular scenario, the prospect of stability and growth may propel sentiment to 2006-2007 levels (around 100), which might portend an increase in PE and real return. Under Stout, we’d suggest a drop in sentiment and a drop in PE, with real return going negative.

Interest Rates

The current monetary policy, which appears to remain unimpeded for at least the calendar year, is toward extremely low interest rates. We think that interest rates will stay low for the year. In the case of a Stout scenario, some federal rates (TIPS for example) could support negative yields.

Consumer 

Consumer debt service as a percentage of disposable personal income was 10.5% in the third quarter of  2012, compared to 14.1% in the third quarter of 2007. With the QE3 loosening and the surge in refinancing, this debt service percent will drop, likely increasing personal savings, and further decreasing debt service. In the absence of a Stout scenario, which would quash consumer spending, the consumer sector should be stable.

Inflation

Basically CPI is relatively stable under 2% (headline at about 1.7% as of 09/30/12). In a Lite scenario, the status quo will probably prevail for 2013, and the inflation rate will likely stay under 2.0%. Under a Regular scenario, inflation may have a very modest initial decline (slight decrease in consumer spending, and the likely ramp up as economic activity increases. Under a stout scenario, inflation would likely drop to zero in the short run.

Commodities

Commodities provide an interesting paradigm by changing their correlations dramatically in different economic scenarios. In the Lite and Normal scenarios we outlined, we think inflation will eventually increase, which historically bodes well for commodities (although equities do better in a low and rising inflation environment). In a Stout scenario, where inflation would likely be lower due to economic decline, commodities would probably suffer declines.

The Hidden Elephant in the Corner

The Money Multiplier: We think it is interesting how most projections summarily ignore the multiplier. The money multiplier, or basically the money supply (M2) divided by the monetary base, expresses how many times money moves when added to the system. For most of 2000-2007, the multiplier was about 8.5, peaking at 9 in late 2007. Basically, one dollar in the system moves about 8.5 times. The multiplier currently sits at 3.8. An expansion in the money multiplier will dramatically increase the money supply and have the effect of quick expansion, probably coupled with quick inflation. The current expansionary monetary policy QE1, QE2 and QE3, coupled with a low multiplier may be creating a ‘pent-up’ inflation situation.

International

Europe appears to be ahead of the US in the Austerity mode. Under the European ‘Austerity Lite’, except Greece, we are currently seeing a mild recession, and nominal GDP growth. In fact, developed market GDP is projected at about 1%. Emerging markets, on the other hand, are poised for GDP growth above 4% in total and in some cases, upwards of 8%. Emerging Markets now represent 50% of world GDP (on a purchasing power parity basis), while only being 13% of the MSCI All Country Index. Emerging markets appear to be a brighter spot on the 2013 horizon.

Contagion

A Stout scenario, which would likely push the US into a recession, would likely create contagion throughout the world economy, including emerging markets. In turbulent times, the correlation of US and international markets reverts to 1.0. In a Lite or regular scenario, the markets will likely stay somewhat disassociated.

Plan

We have currently moved 50% of equity positions into short-term corporate bonds. Pending resolution of the cliff, we shall engage in a re-entry procedure based on the outcome of the negotiations. We’ll continue in emerging market exposure and keep durations short to avert possible inflation.


Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Gauging The Fiscal Cliff

Since the election, an increase in concern for the looming "fiscal cliff" has been made apparent by the media, investors, and even Congress (it's about time).

We have created a chart that is easy to understand and gives a concise explanation of what this so called cliff really is, along with speculative probabilities of fixing each component. Much of it is based on our White Paper about the fiscal cliff from earlier in the year.


Click here to view Gauging the Fiscal Cliff on our site.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Sailing Off the Edge of 2012: Europe, Iran, and the Fiscal Cliff’s Effect as the Biggest Tax Increase, Spending Cuts in 100 years



I remember one of the first times I saw The Weather Channel.  I thought it was neat. I waited until the ‘local weather on the 8s’ and changed the channel.  Strange business model, I thought. Who will watch it for more than 10 minutes? Then I found myself watching more and more, especially the shows about storms. I suppose it’s just human nature to be fascinated with disaster and destruction. I am particularly intrigued by the projection as the storms form in the ocean, build strength and then wreak their fury.  It’s possible we have a triad of storms for the remainder of 2012, with the ‘storm of the century’ hitting on the exact dates of December 31, 2012, and January 1, 2013.

Storm One:  Europe.  Europe is by no means a new problem, nor is it an unknown problem (Greece, for example, has been in default on its debt for the majority of the years it has been an independent country).  The problem of course, is that certain members are forced to bail out or assist other members to keep the stability of the Union.  If the EU were created today, they probably would have instituted a common currency and a common debt, instead of allowing sovereign debt amongst members.  To paraphrase John Maudlin of Millennium Wave, we have three disasters:

Disaster One:  Everyone buckles down.  The Greeks pay their taxes, the Spanish impose austerity, the Germans provide the funds, and the Union strengthens and works its problems out.  This is a long-term ‘good’ solution, and a short term painful solution.  It will probably cause a mild recession in Europe.

Disaster Two:  The EU falls apart.  The Greeks leave the EU, potentially followed by others.  The remaining members either form a ‘Euro Lite’ or go back to their Marks, Francs, Liras and Pesetas.  I think this is disastrous and would cause a serious widespread problem.  Economic output would likely fall an average of 10%, unemployment would soar and inflation would rise.

Disaster Three:  Nothing happens.  In this most likely scenario, the whole thing keeps muddling down the current path of rhetoric and band-aid solutions.  Greece keeps running out of money, the Germans keep paying it; the French tax their citizens, who protest, and so forth.  No real solution until growth lifts all the boats. Continued uncertainty in sues.

Storm Two:  Iran.  Iran is also not a new problem.  The Iranians are desperately seeking to enrich uranium to weapon-grade.  The Israelis and the US (and most of the rest of the world) are desperately trying to stop them.  The showdown is moving to the old west movies where the gunfighters are starting to walk down the street of the town.  Three potential disasters loom:

Disaster One:  Iran builds a nuke.  I would pose that a nuclear armed Iran would be unstable and dangerous under its current regime—bad economically and otherwise.

Disaster Two:  Israel (US) does a preemptive strike.  In the world’s worst-kept secret (to the extent the CIA has published a map of the targets), Israel, fully assisted by the US, hits the Iranian nuclear sites and destroys the Iranian nuclear capacity.

Disaster Three:  The AC/DC non-solution.  In July, some mysterious computer virus hit the Iranian computer system, shut down the centrifuges, and then blared the rock song ‘Thunderstruck’ by AC/DC.  It didn’t stop anything, but it slowed it down.  The idea here is keep making it expensive, keep wasting their time, and they will either give up or somebody new will take over and give it up.

The Storm of the Century:  The Cliff.  The scariest of the storms, the one that puts a gleam in the eye of the Weather Channel boys, is the monster storm forming at the end of the year.  This storm has four or possibly five ‘legs’ that form a cell of enormous magnitude.  The legs are:

  • The expiration of the Bush Tax Cuts (12/31/12), which raise taxes by an average of 17% on all taxpayers, and very adversely raise taxes on working parents and high income investors (think over 70% increase).  Tag about $285 billion in tax increases on individuals, about $75 billion on businesses, the old ugly estate tax, and you have the biggest tax increase in history.
  • The expiration of the payroll tax ‘holiday’ (12/31/12), or the 2% temporary cut in Social Security taxes.  This increases taxes another $127 billion.
  • The new UIMC tax (01/01/13) on unearned income that was added in the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  This adds a 3.8% tax on interest, dividends and capital gains on unearned income for taxpayers with income over $250,000 ($200,000 if single).  $24 billion more.
  • The Budget Sequestration Cuts (01/01/13) take a sledgehammer and immediately knock off $109 billion in Federal spending.
  • And a fifth leg, if you like it, is the expiration of the debt ceiling in or around February of 2013.

So the storm is three significant tax increases, which can cut consumption, which will cut profits, which will slow down hiring; plus federal budget cuts, which will cause unemployment, which may forestall spending; plus the government may not be able to borrow to pay its bills.  In total, the number is daunting:  about $817 billion of tax increases and cuts.  Historically, this is the biggest tax increase in absolute dollars ever.  At 5% of GDP, it’s also the biggest tax increase/spending cut in relative terms since 1942.

What’s also scary is that all of these things happen automatically:  Congress and the President must act to have them NOT happen.  Given the animosity and vitriol in Washington, a smooth solution seems unlikely.  In addition, the election is on November 6th, so it seems further unlikely anything would happen until the lame duck session.  You can game this out, but if we have a new president, the old one may not be amenable to fixing the cliff. The three scenarios again:

Disaster One:  They fix part of it.  This is a hopeful solution; they may extend most of the Bush Tax Cuts, and make some budget changes, maybe let the payroll holiday expire—storm semi-averted.

Disaster Two:  We sail off the cliff.  At least temporarily, huge tax increases (don’t get me started on AMT) and budget cuts will cut GDP, and probably change consumer behavior (a 17% increase in taxes will decrease spending).  In the longer run, the $817 billion goes farther than any of the politicians had dreamed of, raises taxes and cuts spending, pushing us closer to a balanced budget, but at the cost of a recession.  If we go off the cliff and don’t fix the cliff fast, I see the only logical outcome is a recession.

Disaster Three:  They kick the can down the road.  Somewhere right around the end of the year, like December 21st, Congress could move the expirations and effective dates out a year or two.  We can then sit on pins and needles for another couple of years.

The Weather Channel can have a field day with this.  In this case, unlike other storms, such as the subprime crisis, or even my first two Storms, we know the absolute date and time of landfall.  We can tie a cartoon of $817 billion dollars to the ball in Times Square and watch it fall with the ending of 2012.

As for me, I’d rather watch this storm from a safe harbor.  We’ve cut our equity positions 50%, and will wait out that portion in short term corporate bond funds or ETFs. 

On the other hand, the Mayan calendar indicates that the world will end on 12/21/12.  Maybe I’m worrying too much about money.


Leon





Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Additional Ford Lump Sum Seminars

LJPR, LLC
Reducing Uncertainty™ Seminar Series

Reducing UncertaintyTM in your world is one of our goals at LJPR.
We provide a Seminar Series targeting key areas
where we can reduce uncertainty in your financial life.

Now presenting:

Analysis of Lump Sum Buyouts: 
Everything Ford Retirees Need to Know to Make the Best Decision

Presented by: Brian Roehl, CFP®
Limited seating available

We are still on the front lines for you on the topic of the Ford Lump Sum Buyout Offers.

Reducing Uncertainty™ in your world is one of our goals at LJPR; therefore, we have launched a regional Seminar Series targeting key areas where we can assist in the analysis of the many individual decisions Ford Retirees are facing with the lump sum offer they have received.

These seminars are a unique opportunity for you – or those you know affected by the offer – to sit with two of the nation’s experts on Lump Sum Buyout Offers and receive vital information prior to making the important financial decisions the Lump Sum offer presents. As you know, Leon and Brian are experienced in the analysis of this type of Lump Sum Buyout offer and have received national recognition (including in Business Week, Smart Money, The Wall Street Journal, Detroit Free Press, and more) regarding this topic. Leon has released many educational pieces on the topic, including a White Paper, which can give retirees a start on some of the issues they need to consider when making this decision.

Tuesday, September 18, 2012
Seminar will be held in the Troy
Michigan Schools and Government
Credit Union Bldg. (Lower Level)
4555 Investment Drive, Troy, MI 48098

Presentations will begin at 10:00am
Questions will be taken from 11:00pm – 12:00pm
Casual refreshments

RSVP Required: info@ljpr.com or call us at 248.641.7400